Companies fined �300,000 following motorway death
THE companies responsible for a man who died after falling while working over the M5 at Clevedon have been fined �300,000.
Cecil Grant was repairing CCTV cameras used to monitor one lane of the northbound carriageway during the night of January 24, 2006, when he fell 12 metres off a wall and into bushes below, causing serious injuries. The 42-year-old from Southmead died 10 days later.
On Friday, his employers, Serco, and prinicipal contractor, Birse Civils, were sentenced at Bristol Crown Court for breaching health and safety regulations and failing to protect Mr Grant.
The court heard that Serco, based in Hook, Hampshire, did not plan, manage or monitor the work properly.
Both companies had also failed to cooperate with each other to make sure workers at the site near junction 20 were not put in danger.
You may also want to watch:
The Health and Safety Executive prosecuted the companies and its inspector Steve Frain said: “When employees are working at height, proper plans must be put in place and workers made aware of possible risks.
“In this case, Mr Grant had not been made aware of the dangerous drop where he was working. If he had been, a tragic incident could easily have been avoided.”
- 1 Long-standing Clevedon gift store transformed under new owners
- 2 Clevedon Marine Lake drained for 'high bacteria levels'
- 3 Garden waste service disrupted due to 'ongoing crew shortages'
- 4 Green Party candidate elected to council following by-election win
- 5 Council agrees development plan for Nailsea site
- 6 PICTURES: Inside Clevedon Pier's Glass Box Cafe
- 7 Yatton development welcomes first movers
- 8 Nailsea pub crowned best in South West
- 9 Covid warning issued in North Somerset
- 10 Legal action starts to remove Portishead traveller camp
Serco pleaded guilty to breaching two health and safety regulations and was fined �100,000 for each as well as being ordered to pay �36,186.
Birse Civils, of Tadcaster, North Yorkshire, pleaded guilty to breaching one regulation and was fined �100,000 with costs of �180,093.