Sainsbury’s plans could be given go-ahead
PLANS for a Sainsbury’s supermarket in Portishead could be given the go-ahead by North Somerset Councillors tomorrow (Thurs).
PLANS for a Sainsbury’s supermarket in Portishead could be given the go-ahead by North Somerset Councillors on Thursday.
Planning officers at the unitary authority have recommended that the proposals for a store in Serbert Way be approved.
A decision on the proposals was originally expected in May when they were first put to the council’s North Area Planning Committee.
However, lawyers for the Co-Operative Group, which owns a supermarket in nearby Wyndham Way, launched a legal challenge saying that North Somerset Council had not properly analysed the plans against planning policy and that the original report written for members of the committee was ill-founded.
You may also want to watch:
As a result, independent planning consultants were brought in to look at the plans and consider the claims made by the Co-Ooperative Group as well as objections made by Waitrose and Budgens, which also own stores in Portishead.
In a report written for Thursday’s committee meeting, which has taken into account the findings from the planning consultants, the Sainsbury’s plans have been recommended for approval.
- 1 How to order free Covid home tests
- 2 Man charged with two counts of attempted murder
- 3 Celebrations after non-essential shops and pubs reopen in North Somerset
- 4 Barclays to close North Somerset branches
- 5 Nailsea Cricket Club start senior nets for new season
- 6 Nailsea's first virtual flower show winners announced
- 7 Special school expansion progress
- 8 North Somerset and Somerset libraries reopen this week
- 9 Backwell boy raises more than £1k for Dementia UK
- 10 Clevedon's first tournament of season is big hit
It is believed that the applicant has endeavoured to find a site close to the town centre and that the new supermarket would make a positive contribution to employment generation.
It is also considered that the new supermarket would not have a significant adverse impact on the vitality town centre, an issue raised by all three objectors.